Welcome, Guest!
The imperfections of the college process
Published: Thursday, November 20, 2008 - 11:01pm
Every year seniors complain about the college process. It's stressful, and how are we supposed to decide our futures?
There's generally whining and moaning about everything from AP tests to turning in forms on time. But you don't really know what it's like until you've hit that glorious senior year. Even last year, as I was taking my standardized tests, I felt stressed out, but I nonetheless felt as though my college decision-making was so far off. I mean, everyone wants a good test score, but that's about as far as it went when I was a junior.
I think the first time the thought of college really struck me was when I had to take the PSAT my sophomore year. But, still, we were sitting in a hotel room with our friends and in my mind all I was thinking was, "Yes! I get another day off of school!"
After each section was finished we were told to put our pencils down … but if someone wasn't finished with their work then they kept writing for as long as possible. Many students talked about their answers to the various problems, which I'm pretty sure is against the rules, because then (as I witnessed many classmates doing) people would flip back to that section and fill in their skipped questions. Some people even decided to make use of their memorization abilities and remembered math problems, wrote them at the top of their reading section and worked them out, then would flip back to the math section as soon as they had completed reading. It might not have been fair, but that was how it was happening.
I always thought that Uni students lived outside that realm. That they cared about a school's fit to them and not which school has the best reported statistics. But, as I witnessed sophomore year, then again junior year, and even now senior year as people are getting their SAT II scores back, we put a lot of emphasis on how well we look on paper.
We all know that student who we think is on the duller end of the spectrum. They get pretty solid C's, sleep constantly during class, exert little effort, and don't participate in any extracurriculars … and then BAM! Their test scores are absolutely phenomenal. We just excuse it because we know we're smarter than them. Or so that's what we think.
But somewhere deep down our brains our telling us that it's not only about getting into college; doing well on these tests is about verifying our own knowledge. I've know people to go into testing centers while under the influence of marijuana, and they perform miraculously well. So, is that really saying something about the person's individual capabilities? Probably not. And most of us probably know that. But the test is nonetheless seen as an accurate reflection of ourselves.
We've all been told that standardized tests can't really measure how smart we are. And most of us would agree the "teaching-to-the-test" method of No Child Left Behind has been fairly ineffective. But, all the while we can't seem to get it out of our heads that there is some validation to the ACT and SAT, so we stay up and learn how to fill in bubbles and answer questions we already know (and this is different from teaching to the test how?).
I mean, we may've all learned about A squared plus B squared equals C squared in geometry freshman year, and we may all be able to understand the reading passage about Susie's trip to Grandpa's house, but if one person can prove that they actually know how to read the test-writer's mind better, then they should obviously be deemed smarter.
Many prestigious schools still rely on the statistics from ACTs, SATs, SAT IIs, APs, etc. to judge a student. And, it's hard to say that there's a better way to measure someone's capabilities.
Sure, there has been a recent move toward looking at transcripts, extracurriculars, and interviews, but the idea that test scores are still a part of a the college admissions process is what keeps students stressing out over these multiple-section tests. Because we all know that even if we don't think it's a good system, the schools do, and that's what matters.
It could be worse. I had two French students stay with me this summer, and they told me about "Le Bac," which is essentially their equivalent of the SAT. Except they only get one chance to take it. It's a one-shot deal, so if you're sick, have a family emergency, or are suffering from really horrible cramps … well, too bad, you better suck it up and perform well anyway. Though, as they explained to me, the one way they wouldn't have to take the test on the assigned dates (yes, it's actually a multiple-day test, instead of trying to judge all a student's academic potential within a four-hour time slot) was if someone in the school died (because apparently everyone else would then become extremely depressed and morbid).
But, no matter how extreme it seems in other countries, there is still that feeling of pressure and anxiety even here in America with our greater flexibility. We can take the ACT or SAT or SAT II or AP, and we can take them when we want to sign up for them, and if we aren't happy with our score then we can just retake it later. It's pretty open and fits pretty well to the student. But you look around and people are still freaking themselves out. They force themselves to eat foods they don't like because they're healthy and "help the mind," and they study huge books that cost $50, and get 12 hours of sleep (even when that's the longest they've slept since they were 10).
It's partially due to the strive to get into a good college, but potentially more so to the need to prove ourselves among our peers. We're not rewarded for getting straight A's, and just because we're in three clubs, three sports, and volunteer on weekends, doesn't mean anyone is going to come up to us Friday after school and say, "Congratulations on being such a productive, active student." Instead, when you get a good test score your name is put on the Online Gargoyle, you're given notes on your locker, and other people are wowed by your performance.
We know somewhere in the backs of our minds that none of this is an accurate measurement. Maybe it's in the right ballpark, but we all know that one point doesn't mean that we're smarter than our friends. We may want to believe that at times, and it really can be a hard thing to realize, but sometimes we need to take a step back and laugh at how much we're tangling ourselves up in the imperfect college system.





Comments
On college apps and test scores
Nice article. The college app process is complicated, no doubt, but at least we are trending toward simplification with the advent of the Common App, online teacher rec forms, and other relatively new things that reduce the hassle of mailing envelopes to colleges.
Standardized tests might be anxiety-inducing, but so are grades and other factors that colleges consider. SAT/ACT/AP scores are extremely critical to an application partly because they are the only objective measurements that admission officers see and can compare among applicants. I have read about some colleges which stopped considering the SAT in the admissions process and I think those colleges have made a big mistake.
Why do you think SAT/ACT/AP
Why do you think SAT/ACT/AP scores are "extremely critical?" Even AP tests can fail at measuring a student's mastery of a subject. Take for example Uni history classes. None of the history teachers at Uni teach to the AP curriculum and therefore students wouldn't tend to do as well on AP tests without supplementary studying. This is because the AP tests you on factoids, themes, and motives rather than testing genuine understanding. In many college-prep high schools, AP classes are built exclusively around AP curriculum. If CollegeBoard decides you don't need to learn something, you don't.
I don't think SAC, ACT, and other standardized tests are irrelevant. They are certainly useful for some purposes and do have some advantages. But far too much stock is put into their accuracy and their importance.
And I leave you with some reading material:
Study of Standardized Admissions Tests Is Big Draw at College Conference
SAT/ACT, etc.
The fact that Harvard and most other colleges continue to require the SAT/ACT indicates to me that it is an important part of the app. It's probably not a good idea to evaluate applicants solely on test scores, but it's important to have test scores to look at. Everything else (GPA, extracurriculars, etc.) involves subjectivity. GPAs for instance can't be so readily compared, and having no class rank to accompany a GPA (as is the case with many schools now) only further obscures analysis of the GPA in an appropriate context.
AP tests measure mastery of subjects based on the AP topic outlines, and based on my personal experience, I think they do a very good job of that. Our US History class, as you mentioned, doesn't follow the AP outline so you can't expect the AP US History test to measure someone's performance in Uni High US History.
On a side note, all AP classes are not the same. While the topic outline is standard, teaching styles vary, and the AP programs are structured to give teachers room to present additional material outside of the AP syllabus.
Post new comment