Welcome, Guest!
Film Review: "Dr. Seuss' The Lorax": Fuzzy and fun
Promotional picture used under the Fair Use DoctrineThe Lorax, keeper of the trees, gives a menacing glare after he finds a tree chopped down. The Lorax was released on March 2, 2012.Published: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 - 4:44pm

Released: 2 March 2012
Directed by: Chris Renaud, Kyle Balda
Run Time: 86 min

The Lorax is a movie that will either make you smile or cringe. It is full of adorable teddy bears, bright colors, and musical numbers. This movie will please those who want to see a laid back, cheerful movie. If you are looking for adventure and suspense, look elsewhere.
In Thneedville ignorance is bliss. The citizens of the city know nothing about nature or the impact that their actions have on their environment. The entire town consists of man-made materials like plastics and metals. There is not a patch of real grass anywhere in the city and there are no real trees. Thneedville residents buy special O'Hare Air, clean air for their homes, so that they can survive the horribly polluted air outside of Thneedville.
Ted is a young boy in Thneedville who is hopelessly in love with a girl named Audrey. He will do anything to win her love... even if this means finding a real tree. To accomplish this seemingly impossible task, Ted goes to see the Once-ler, an old man who knows why all of the trees disappeared. The Once-ler promises to tell Ted the mystery if Ted promises to return.
Soon Ted is dodging O'Hare Air agents after they find out that he wants to bring a tree into the city. Mr. O'Hare is only concerned with keeping his monopoly on clean air, and bringing in trees is only a threat to this power. The Lorax follows Ted as he attempts to find a real tree and also tells the story of the Once-ler and the transformation of a beautiful forest into a polluted Thneedville.
The style of animation emphasized the adorable look of the characters and also helped give the movie a "Dr. Seuss" feel. The trees, the animals, and the Lorax looked similar to the way they are drawn in the Dr. Seuss books. One memorable thing about the animation was the film's use of color. There were many bright colors, most of them pinks, oranges and greens. These bright colors helped emphasize the difference between a beautifully clean forest and a polluted city.
The message of this movie was very clear -- be aware of the environment and take care of it, otherwise soon it could be gone. Even though this moral drove the plot of the story, it wasn't pounded into the audience's heads and shoved right in their faces. Instead, by using determined but relatable characters combined with an interesting story line, the movie inspired viewers to make a difference.
The dialog of this movie was funny at times, and the narration was done in rhyme like the Dr. Seuss books. Some lines were even exact quotes from the books. I also thought that the way the movie began was interesting. At the beginning of the movie the Lorax steps up and announces to the audience (in rhyme of course) that he speaks for the trees and gives the premise of the movie. I haven't seen this approach at a beginning in recent movies and I was pleasantly surprised by its use.
I enjoyed this movie, but it is not one of those movies that I would want to revisit. There is little action in this movie and there aren't any surprise endings or twists that would make it stand out from any other children's movie. The story line was more or less predictable from the very beginning and I think that this made the movie less memorable than it could have been.
One thing I did not like about this movie was the fact that I felt as if the flow of the movie was continually interrupted by completely random, slightly confusing scenes. There are about three or four musical numbers in the movie, complete with dancing that happen in the weirdest places. Another slightly confusing instance was when the Lorax suddenly, out of nowhere, lifts up his tail and dramatically floats into heaven leaving a trail of gold sparkles. Marshmallow showers and disco trees complete the picture. Maybe the directors were trying to incorporate some Dr. Suess weirdness but I think that some scenes were just unnecessary to the story.
Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed this movie. It has something to please everyone -- unless you are a Grinch, then this movie will be a complete bore -- and I would recommend going to see it. I would highly encourage any Dr. Seuss fan to go, even though The Lorax may only be loosely based on the book I think it is the best Dr. Seuss film yet. It even beats "Horton Hears a Who." The Lorax has cute teddy bears, cheery musical numbers, a good plot, and wonderful animation, what more could you ask for from a children's movie?



Comments
I Want To See This!
This looks like a good movie! The Lorax was my favorite Dr. Seuss book, and I've been wanting for them to make a newer version of the movie.
I am happy that they included the disappearance of the Lorax, in which he grabs his tail and floats away. Even though the book didn't include marshmallow showers or disco trees, I am happy that they didn't destroy the true story by giving it a "happy" ending for the Lorax, as that did not occur in the story.
On another note, do you think that the love story mixed into the original story destroys the original quality of the original Seuss story? I have heard mixed reviews about the addition of the love story to the original story.
Thanks for the great article!
Jacob Rajlich--Class of '16
A hit with the preschool set
My 4-year-old daughter's preschool took a class trip to see this movie yesterday morning, and she liked it a lot. For what it's worth, she reports that her favorite part was when "the Lorax goes up to heaven" (and I was like, Huh? I don't remember that in the book . . . she must've remembered it wrong). But apparently there is indeed such a sequence, as cited in this review! So one viewer's "confusing and unnecessary" is another's favorite part. (And she didn't seem to have too strong a grasp on the larger narrative scope, the environmental subtext, or any of that. She mainly liked the bright colors and the silly stuff. So we'll have to wait a few more years to indoctrinate her into the Seussian radical-environmentalist agenda.)
Yes, but...
How can the Lorax still speak for the trees
When he's also a shill for S-U-Vees?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2012/03/02/147806335/the-lorax-speaks...
http://www.change.org/petitions/mazda-stop-forcing-the-lorax-to-sell-dan...
I used NOT going to see the Lorax as a means of educating my 10-year-old that unless someone cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better (it snot).
And sometimes UNLESS means making the hard choices, taking a stand and NOT doing something that's really fun, like going to see The Lorax... Other times it means stuff REALLY fun, like learning to drive a TWIKE when you're ten year's old on your way to school with dad...
Yes, eventually we'll see the movie -- we'll probably Red Box it or Netflix it. But the point is she will have learned to look beyond and she'll start seeing the greenwashing that companies like Monsanto et. al. try to pull off.
UNLESS...
M@ the Uni High IT guy
Class of '89