In case you haven’t noticed already, the recently posted editorial, “Tolerance at Uni”, has obviously struck a chord in more than a few students’, faculties’, and parents’ hearts.
The more heated this discussion, or maybe better described as “this argument,” gets, the harder people stick to their beliefs, and the more opposed they become to the flip side. This debate is going to be a never-ending boxing match because neither opponent will submit to a K.O.
At one corner of the ring are students, including the Gargoyle’s senior editors, who feel that Uni provides a very tolerant atmosphere for everyone. Thus, a group like the minority student advocacy program, created to help acclimate underrepresented minority students to the Uni community, is exclusive, abrasive, and ultimately unnecessary.
At the other are students, parents, and even some faculty members who feel as if the majority of the Uni community, being the bubble of prestige and privilege that it is, does not understand what it means, and feels like, to be a minority in a predominantly advantaged, white population. Therefore, the majority of the community lacks any inkling of the compassion needed to combat this false sense of equality.
So who’s in the right? The “smug and self-satisfied” students, or the supporters of the minority student advocacy program that is “facilitating more hatred and tension”?
Sigh. I doubt we’ll ever have an answer because both sides, if I may be so bold to assert, are neither entirely in the right nor entirely in the wrong.
But I’m not writing this to give you an answer, or enlighten you in one way or another about this controversy. Rather, I’m giving a piece of advice. With the hostility and anger that is slowly building up (or maybe being let out?), it’s probably best to not sympathize with either party.
Blasphemy, right? If a human being is not going to have an opinion, they might as well be a robot. So maybe I’m not saying, “Don’t have an opinion,” but rather, “Keep your opinion to yourself.”
Why, you ask? I’m always pro-free speech, scream your opinion, get as pissed off as you want and don’t be afraid to do it. But not so much now. Upon voicing an opinion, one is bound to immediately get labeled as either an “unsympathetic, privileged, self-centered, racist” person or a “way-too sensitive, whiney, over-the-top PC” person, when in fact these labels do not accurately describe anyone involved.
Also, posting just one comment puts you in the realm where anger and hostility are ruling over reason. I’ve talked to more than a few peers who wanted to post a comment, but decided against it because they were afraid to face the angry mob. The sad truth is if they had posted, they probably would have been eaten alive. The long page of comments reminds me of a deep, dark pit filled with hungry velociraptors waiting to rip you apart. Someone is bound to focus on one little part of your argument, go on and on about how truly wrong and stupid you are, and as a result take away from the point you were really trying to make.
The way I see it, everyone is so pissed off for one reason or the other, no one is actually absorbing or considering what anyone else has to say. Reading the 90 or so comments reminds me of the type of arguments my mom and I have where we incessantly yell at each other, not listening to one another, until our voices become so hoarse that we are forced to stop. It’s not until a while after our little skirmishes do we realize that talking things through work better than testing out the endurance of our vocal chords.
Currently, no one is level-headed enough to talk things through in a civilized, constructive manner. Emotion is clouding reason. So until that day when things have sufficiently cooled off, I advise all of the rest of you to keep your mouths shut.
— Andrea Park