« April 2006 | Main | September 2006 »

May 7, 2006

10 a.m. starts: A nice dream, an impossible reality

Teenagers have been dreaming of a school day in which classes don’t start until later in the morning since the beginning of public education. But it seems highly unlikely, even with the proposed schedule changes on the table, that this dream will ever become a reality.

While there are some pros, the one overwhelming con is this: Parents can’t get their kids to school at 10 a.m. It is just a fact of life. A majority of families have two working parents, and both parents probably have to get to work between 8 and 8:30. So who will take the kid to school?

Maybe some families work something out. Maybe some hire a driver to drive their kids to school at 10. Maybe some have their kids ride their bikes or take a bus. Maybe some carpool with another family. But, you are always going to have one kid who cannot get to school.

The only way for Uni to possibly make this work is to set up a bus system for the kids who aren’t close enough in town to take an MTD. Yet, for some reason, I don’t see this happening. If start time were pushed back to 10 for some days, the only people you are making happier are the students, and when has Uni ever worried about that?

Sarah Pfander

May 4, 2006

Top 21. Wohoo. Kinda. Sorta. Not really...

Uni’s been ranked by Newsweek as one of the top 21 schools in the country. That’s… pretty awesome, I have to say. This is the entire country we’re talking about. The fact that the high school that we go to has been ranked one of the top 21… that seems pretty prestigious.

What irks me, though, is the way that the schools were ranked, and then portrayed. Were we chosen just because our ACT and SAT scores were high? Wasn’t anything else looked at? In Bianca Zaharescu’s article, Sue Kovacs said, “…and we [didn’t] qualify [for the main list] because we have too high a percentage of students who go to college and do well on tests…”

That doesn’t make sense to me at all. Because Uni (and 20 other schools, apparently) was “too good” for the general list, they decided to make another list of “public elites.” And then after listing those public elites, they didn’t really say anything about them. For instance, their sentence on Uni: “A five-year high school partnered with the University of Illinois.”

Is it just me, or is that completely ridiculous? So now we’re the five-year high school. Fantastic. How descriptive. They don’t talk about why any of these schools are so wonderful, apart from test scores. And this leads into the whole issue of whether or not standardized tests are a good way to evaluate intelligence.

So while I’m glad that Uni was ranked — we really do have a great school — it’s not a feeling of overwhelming joy. It’s kind of like, Okay, so they noticed that our test scores were higher than average, and we’re a five-year high school. Great. Let me think about this for all of five seconds, and then completely forget about it.

In addition, this obsession that everyone has with ranking things is utterly absurd. Getting back into the test scores… there are probably lots more schools out there that outshine Uni in some aspect. Music, art, science, math… schools each have their strong points. Another thing schools are supposed to do is get their students ready for real life. Not just the academic stuff. Standardized test scores don’t reflect how well students are being taught about these things. They reflect how well students are being taught to know what test-writers want them to say, and fill in a little bubble.

You don’t have to go to an elite high school to get into an Ivy League school — oh, shoot, there I go again. Ivy League. Top-ranking colleges. Again with the rankings. Let me try again: You don’t have to go to an elite high school or college to make it in real life. It’ll help, sure. But if you have the drive and talent, it shouldn’t matter where you go to school. The name might get you into high places, but you’ll have to rely on yourself to stay there.

Michelle Gao