Welcome, Guest!
Oh, the places they'll go!
A look at the Class of 2009's college plans
Published: Saturday, May 9, 2009 - 3:19pm
URBANA — Twenty-five lucky colleges will be enrolling students from Uni's 57-member senior class this fall.
Nineteen students — exactly one-third of the Class of 2009 — plan to attend the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The local campus is typically Uni students' most popular choice by a wide margin.
Six students will matriculate at the University of Chicago, this year's second most popular destination.
More than half of this year's seniors will attend colleges in Illinois.
Rising above the competition
Despite a record number of applicants to most colleges, Uni students continued to land coveted admissions offers at top schools. Fourteen seniors will attend a college ranked in the top 20 overall by U.S. News & World Report.
Two students plan to study engineering at No. 6 Caltech, a small private university in Southern California. It is the highest-ranked school any senior will attend this year.
The other top 10 U.S. News school is No. 8 Chicago, with six students heading there.
Rounding out the top 20 are Northwestern University (one student) and Washington University in St. Louis (three students), both ranked at No. 12; No. 14 Cornell University (one student); and No. 18 Emory University (one student).
A worthy investment?
The average senior will face around $42,000 in annual fees, less any financial aid and scholarships.
Most students could have reduced their annual expenses by choosing to attend a different school. But many say that the extra cost represents an investment that will pay off in the long run — both in financial well-being and in personal enrichment.
Class of 2009: College Choices and Majors
At a glance
(click to enlarge)







Infographics by Isaac Chambers (click any graphic to enlarge and to create your own slideshow )
- Beloit College
- Jacob Druker, philosophy
- Stephen Prochaska, psychology
- Rachel Skoza, environmental studies
- Bennington College
- Sierra Marcum, undecided
- Boston University
- Jess Stewart, political science
- Bryn Mawr College
- Karen Han, undecided
- California Institute of Technology
- Vaishnavi Giridaran, biochemistry and biomedical engineering
- Karolina Kalbarczyk, chemical engineering
- Carnegie Mellon University
- Paul Miller, visual art
- Columbia College Chicago
- Lauren Piester, journalism
- Cornell College
- Carter Hutchens, psychology
- Sarah Lake-Rayburn, theater
- Russell Prochaska, undecided
- Cornell University
- Alan Liang, computer engineering
- Earlham College
- Holden Bucher, mathematics
- Emory University
- Isaac Chambers, business and political science
- Harvey Mudd College
- Carl Pearson, undecided
- Illinois Wesleyan University
- Rob Diehl, anthropology
- Noel Knox, biology
- Johnson and Wales University
- Maddy Levin, baking and pastry arts
- Knox College
- Lizzy Warner, economics
- Marquette University
- Deborah Ladd, business
- New York University
- Adam Tiouririne, finance and political science
- Northwestern University
- Jason He, economics and mathematics
- Tufts University
- Teddy Zamora-Mills, international relations
- University of California at Davis
- Natsuki Nakamura, biology
- University of Chicago
- Elaine Gu, economics
- Rachel Hyman, linguistics
- Hannah Leskosky, undecided
- Andrew Lovdahl, biology
- Kareem Sayegh, physics
- Richard Wang, chemistry
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Jasmine Alvarado, undecided
- Greg Atherton, mechanical engineering
- Daniel Borup, engineering
- Caroline Brown, anthropology
- Avanti Chajed, education
- Ben Daniels, biological science
- Clement Dossin, anthropology
- Jeremy Kemball, biomedical engineering
- Alan Kessler, actuarial science
- Deren Kudeki, computer science
- Annie Machesky, undecided
- Arif Nelson, mechanical engineering
- Nish Nookala, electrical engineering
- Joy Shapley, linguistics
- Jessi Sullivan, community health
- Malcolm Taylor, undecided
- Laura Voitik, animal sciences
- Charlie Wan, electrical engineering
- Brian Wang, physics
- University of Michigan at Ann Arbor
- Sheri Grill, premed
- Laura Sligar, psychology and sociology
- University of Pittsburgh
- James Smith, international business
- Washington University in St. Louis
- Allan Luo, biology
- Cheng Luo, biology and chemistry
- Gordon Ruan, chemistry




Comments
Please check the categories in the US News + ...
If you actually read the article in the US News and World Report, there is a separate category for small Liberal Arts Colleges. Several of your classmates are attending top 20 colleges. Your revised draft should inlcude them.
I did check
I did check the categories. The authors are correct — they said "overall," which is what the "National Universities" category refers to. There are lots of other categories as well. U.S. News no doubt created those categories to make more people feel better, to allow more people to boast about their schools, and to sell more copies of their guide.
If Jason and Isaac want to refer to more categories, they can. But what they've written is accurate. I myself would have included no reference whatsover to rankings, because they are extremely problematic if not outright bogus. But that's just my opinion. We've included the links to the U.S. News guide. People can click those links, see the other categories, and draw their own conclusions.
As for your last sentence, I wasn't aware you were the Gargoyle adviser. If you're under that impression, please call me, and we'll have a productive conversation.
I agree with D. Porreca. The
I agree with D. Porreca. The special recognition given to one company's top-ranked schools in this article is a bit repulsive––as in, while I read it I kind of felt sick that my high school's newspaper is lending credibility to that bogus US News stuff. Maybe those students who were unable to "rise above the competition this year" to make it into "top" schools feel similarly? The informational weighting provided to that stuff in this article comes off as pretty boastful. It doesn't help my gut reaction to this article that both authors happen to be attending one of that one company's Top 20 schools. The other information is good, like the map and the infographics (besides that corporate US News-looking one that simply tabulates all the ranking talk from the bad part of the article).
What about the fact that someone's majoring in Pastry Arts? That's way cooler than the type of information given in the majority of the article's body.
An opposing viewpoint
While the US News and World report is by no means the definitive measure of the value of an institution, it is a meaningful comparison to many people and therefore in appropriate place in a newspaper that is open to the public. When I look at the list of schools, I don't see any students who were unable to rise above the competition, and when a student goes off the beaten path and wants a degree in baking, they get an article about them.
As interesting as Maddy Levin's chosen focus is, there are 56 other students who have put in a lot of hard work to gain admission to traditionally high-ranked institutions, and they deserve recognition as well. This article should not be taken as boasting aimed at those students who did not happen to fall into the small number of schools that US News and World Report approves of. Instead, it should be taken as a testament to what 57 graduating seniors can do with a top-notch high school education in a difficult year for admissions and financial aid.
Ivys not an indicator
Thanks Carl. Jason and I hadn't intended for the top 10 or top 20 remarks to be boastful. We added those figures to show that just because Uni seniors this year didn't get into many Ivys doesn't mean they didn't have success in the college admissions process. I agree with Carl — all of the colleges Uni seniors will be attending are very good and everyone should be proud of their accomplishments.
No one in Stanford, Harvard, or MIT ?
Hard to be encouraged!
Dear anonymous, Your
Dear anonymous,
Your comment was unnecessary and unappreciated. Maybe some people applied and didn't get in, due either to the fact that this is the toughest admissions year ever or they just didn't fit in at that school, or maybe we just really didn't care one bit about big-name universities. Either way, the variety of places we've chosen to further our educations is hardly discouraging. Success doesn't come from prestige.
Lauren
wow
wow, no offense, but this was kind of a flop year for Uni admissions. I mean, I've heard that Uni is the smart school and yet there is no one on this list who got into harvard, yale, or princeton and only one person got into an ivy. that's pretty disappointing.
First of all, see my above
First of all, see my above comment. Yours is even less appreciated than the other one. No offense? You're basically saying that our class is dumb. "Disappointing." Just because you hear about Harvard, Yale, and Princeton all the time does not, by any means, indicate that these are the best, most acceptable college destinations, or that they are the right fit for anyone in the class. Maybe the people who didn't get into them didn't get in for a reason. Maybe most of us didn't apply to them for a reason. Should a person go to one of those institutions just because of the name? Of the prestige?
Maybe you meant no offense, but believe me, offense has been and will be taken. 57 seniors have just spent the past few months crying over rejection letters and pulling their hair out in order to make the biggest decisions of their lives, and now you're telling them all that it's not good enough.
You have no business making that judgment. Besides, this is a celebratory article. No one needs to hear how much they disappoint you, especially since you can't even be bothered to identify yourself.
I'd like to point out that,
I'd like to point out that, first of all, this is a list of schools people are attending, not where they were admitted. If you'd like evidence of the class of 2009's successful endeavors, please feel free to browse through the many articles regarding state and national awards for chess, poetry, journalism, academic challenges, science competitions, and national merit, as well as in-depth articles about the many humanitarian efforts led by seniors this year alone. Perhaps the class of 2009 feels there are more important things to life than ivy league schools, or, like myself, are simply excited to attend a quality school in our own backyards.
Its sad if the only way to
Its sad if the only way to judge a UNI students success is what college they get into. College is extremely important but it isn't the only thing that students should be working toward. Isn't it more important what you do after college?
Quality in the eye of the beholder?
What an intriguing exchange! As someone who has taught this class -- and others with "Ivy" acceptances -- I think maybe this class might be more down-to-Earth, quite apart from the well-made points of Daniel Borup. A quality education may be gained at any number of schools that aren't "Ivy" or on any "Top 10" list. I got a wonderful education at a small school no one ever heard of, one not even in the top 50 -- although no one bothered to "rate" schools in the dark ages when I went. Besides, the quality of education at many of the big name schools comes on a graduate level when you actually have the professors that give the school the ranking and not, as on the undergraduate level, some TA who just earned a degree from the college you turned down.
That said, what do you make of two students in Cal Tech? One in Harvey Mudd. Have we forgotten the west coast? You want "competitive"?
Finally, one has to wonder where "anonymous" has been accepted.
congratulations, '09! I'm
congratulations, '09! I'm impressed
I think that true uni
I think that true uni students can make their own decisions for their own merits not by name values. In that regard, I really cannot understand why the article included that top 20 nonsense, really. Why??
I really cannot understand
I really cannot understand why you asked questions that have been already answered. Why??
Face the truth, even it is hard!
I am Uni Fan, and do not want to hear any negative comment on Uni. However, it is very difficult to have good words for this year. Why? Check "College destinations: Here's where you'll find the Class of 2007" http://www.uni.uiuc.edu/og/2007/05/here_are_a_list_of.htm , you should be able to find the reason.
How great is the placement of class 2009? Compared to other high schools in CU, it is great! Does Uni really want to lower itself to that level? No offense to any other schools.
Uni is on the elite list of pubic schools in US on US & News report. If this is standard, I wonder that anyone will give any positive comment for this year placement.
Competition? What is competition? What Level? Intel Science Talent Search competition? Siemens Competition? or competition just for ****? No offend for other competitions.
It is true that getting in Stanford, Harvard, Princeton, or MIT will not guarantee your success in your future; but it is very, very important indicator for the chance of future success, and the reputation of high school. Any argument for this will be political argument, and you will go nowhere in the future.
"It is true that getting in
"It is true that getting in Stanford, Harvard, Princeton, or MIT will not guarantee your success in your future"
What world do you live in?
siemens and competitions
There was a student from the class of 2009 that was awarded in the Siemens competition this year:
http://www.uni.uiuc.edu/og/news/2008/11/richard-wang-named-regional-fina...
All I can say that I haven't
All I can say that I haven't already said is that we are not the class of 2008, 2007, 2006, or any class that has ever come before. We're unique. I think this list of colleges gives a statement about who our class is as a whole, and I don't think it's a bad statement. Some classes are very into prestige, some are more into where they're going to fit and be happy for the next four or more years. You don't know what went into our college decisions. Most people I know didn't even apply to these big-name places, because they didn't want to go there. That says nothing about how "smart" we are, at least in terms of academics. We had different priorities in planning for our futures. At the very least, the fact that we're not going to these places indicates that maybe we just couldn't afford it. Either way, you may think you're being dignified in your comment, but truly you just don't know what you're talking about. All you see is the end result. This article doesn't include any of the reasons behind any of these decisions, and you obviously haven't looked in depth at any of these schools.
However, you are right to say that going to Stanford, Havard, Princeton, or MIT doesn't guarantee success - no school does. Every person is different.
Where did/are you going to college?
By all accounts, this year's
By all accounts, this year's college admissions was the toughest. Many top schools had record numbers of applications. In just two years, Harvard's admissions rate dropped from 9% to 7%. In the same amount of time, Yale admissions rate dropped from 10% to 7%. It's projected that admissions starting next year will ease up— high school graduating class of 2009 was the hardest year.
Now let's take a look at comparing classes:
The class of 2007 had 59 students.
The class of 2009 has 57 students.
The class of 2007 had an average SAT score of 1397.
The class of 2009 has an average SAT score of 1409.
The class of 2007 had 15 National Merit Finalists.
The class of 2009 had 20 National Merit Finalists.
The class of 2007 had 0 Presidential Scholar Semifinalists.
The class of 2009 had 2 Presidential Scholar Semifinalists.
The class of 2007 had 0 Coca-Cola scholar finalists.
The class of 2009 had 1 Coca-Cola scholar finalist.
The class of 2007 had 0 Siemens regional finalists.
The class of 2009 had 1 Siemens regional finalist.
Interestingly, you'll also see that the class of 2007 had 16 people with perfect 4.0 GPAs. The class of 2009 has only six. Grade deflation may have also hurt college admissions.
Wow, UNI FAN, I hear you!
Wow, UNI FAN, I hear you!
OK, first of all this isn't
OK, first of all this isn't 4chan and you are not legion. Give yourself a name, even if it's a pseudonym, so we can at least know who said what.
Secondly, Uni Fan, graduating seniors do not have to worry about Uni's reputation. As soon as you get into college what high school you went to ceases to matter. And guess what? As soon as you get a job what college you went to ceases to matter. Your first employer in your chosen field will look at where you got your degree, and then all the rest will only be interested in previous work experience. As for a "predictor," the only thing your college admissions "predicts" with any accuracy is how well you did in high school.
Seriously, you just sound like you have a bad attitude about this whole thing, talking about Uni "lowering itself" to compare against schools like Central and Centennial, talking about "competitions just for ****" whatever that's supposed to mean. That kind of pretentious attitude doesn't surprise me from someone who only respects Ivy League schools, although it contrasts oddly with your own lack of command over the English language. Before you start telling everyone that they didn't get into a good enough school, fix the last sentence of your post because it makes no sense.
Not to mention that all this discussion raises the question of where you got into college, Uni Fan. Was it a prestigious place? Was it so great that you now look down upon anyone who didn't go to Harvard, Yale, Princeton or MIT? If so that's really great for you. I hope your degree means you're enjoying all sorts of success and apparently your impressive income means you have enough free time to come on here and insult us. If not, that's pretty sad and you should consider being a bit more circumspect.
New Perspective
Speaking as someone who chose a small liberal arts school that was somewhat undervalued in the midst of classmates at Harvard, Princeton, Dartmouth, Cornell, Stanford, Hopkins, and Caltech, I know the value of a school that fits you. I think that choices made to go to Non-Ivy schools are done for a reason, and that the class of 2009 has several students that just aren't into that sort of school, and that's refreshing on several levels.
As for Uni's prestige as a top school: I belive it is still listed as a Public Elite (correct me if I'm wrong) and thus is still considered a pretty damn good school. If the current graduating class chooses to go to universities that aren't "up to par" by the standards of those who prefer to remain anonymous, perhaps they should reevaluate their standards.
I chose a tiny school that has a sense of community, the biochem program I wanted, and gave me a full tuition scholarship. We all have reasons for choosing what we did. I would be interested to learn the reasoning behind why some of the seniors chose the schools they did, especially the ones that I haven't heard of. Maybe we missed out on a good school, and they discovered that it was right for them.
I agree with what the class
I agree with what the class of '09 students and Chelsea have said. Last year I was accepted and decided to attend Emory University, one of U.S. News & World Report's top 20 schools. It is an excellent school, but was not the right place for me by any means. I ended up taking an unexpected year off this year, and will be going back to school at Goshen College this fall, a small school that few people have ever heard of. Despite the fact that I have not found Goshen in any top 20 list so far, I know that I will receive a much better education there than I would have at Emory because the fit is right for me. I am sure that there are many people who want to attend Ivy leagues and other big name schools, and I am also sure that they will get a quality education. But that is not what everyone needs. I applaud the class of '09 for knowing themselves and having the courage to pick schools that we might not have ever known about otherwise, but that will fit their needs and give them the quality education they deserve. Congrats class of '09!
Congratulations, guys! I had
Congratulations, guys!
I had fun with each and every (well, not "every" exactly but nearly every) one of you for the two years we had together, and I'll be looking foward to seeing you all happy and successful :) I'm proud and impressed and excited for all of you!!
Go class of 09!!
Post new comment